Theme images by kelvinjay. Powered by Blogger.

USA

AFRICA

ASIA

Brazil

Portugal

United Kingdom

Switzerland

New Cretaceous mammal fossil sheds light on evolution of middle ear


Researchers from the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) have reported a new species of multituberculate - a type of extinct Mesozoic rodent - with well-preserved middle ear bones from the Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China. The findings were published in Nature.

New Cretaceous mammal fossil sheds light on evolution of middle ear
Reconstruction of Jeholbaatar kielanae [Credit: XU Yong]
The new mammal, Jeholbaatar kielanae, has a middle ear that is distinct from those of its relatives. WANG Yuanqing and WANG Haibing from IVPP, along with MENG Jin from AMNH, proposed that the evolution of its auditory apparatus might have been driven by specialization for feeding.

Fossil evidence shows that postdentary bones were either embedded in the postdentary trough on the medial side of the dentary or connected to the dentary via an ossified Meckel's cartilage in early mammals, prior to their migration into the cranium as seen in extant mammals.


Detachment of the mammalian middle ear bones from the dentary occurred independently at least three times. But how and why this process took place in different clades of mammals remains unclear.

The Jeholbaatar kielanae specimen was discovered in the Jiufotang Formation in China's Liaoning Province (Jehol Biota). It displays the first well-preserved middle-ear bones in multituberculates, providing solid evidence of the morphology and articulation of these bony elements, which are fully detached from the dentary.


It reveals a unique configuration with more complete components than those previously reported in multituberculates. The new fossil reveals a transitional stage in the evolution of the surangular - a "reptilian" jawbone.

In light of current evidence, scientists argue that the primary (malleus-incus) and secondary (squamosal-dentary) jaw joints co-evolved in allotherians, allowing a distinct palinal (anteroposterior) jaw movement while chewing.

Detachment of the auditory apparatus of the middle ear would have gained higher selective pressure in order to increase feeding efficiency, suggesting that evolution of the middle ear was probably triggered by functional constraints on the feeding apparatus in allotherians.

Source: Chinese Academy of Sciences [November 27, 2019]

New study shows a carnivorous dinosaur species regrew all its teeth every few months


A meat-eating dinosaur species that lived in Madagascar some 70 million years ago replaced all its teeth every couple of months or so, a new study has found, surprising even the researchers.

New study shows a carnivorous dinosaur species regrew all its teeth every few months
Credit: Sae Bom Ra
In fact, Majungasaurus grew new teeth roughly two to 13 times faster than those of other carnivorous dinosaurs, says paper lead author Michael D. D'Emic, an assistant professor of biology at Adelphi University. Majungasaurus would form a new tooth in each socket every couple of months.

"This meant they were wearing down their teeth quickly, possibly because they were gnawing on bones," D'Emic says. "There is independent evidence for this in the form of scratches and gouges that match the spacing and size of their teeth on a variety of bones - bones from animals that would have been their prey."


Some animals today, too, will gnaw on bones, including rodents, D'Emic explains. It's a way for them to ingest certain nutrients. It also requires exceptionally strong teeth - but Majungasaurus did not have those.

"That's our working hypothesis for why they had such elevated rates of replacement," D'Emic says. The rapid-fire tooth growth puts Majungasaurus in same league with sharks and big, herbivorous dinosaurs, he adds.

New study shows a carnivorous dinosaur species regrew all its teeth every few months
CT scan-generated models of the jaws of Majungasaurus (left), Ceratosaurus (center) and Allosaurus (right), with
microscopic views of the interior of their teeth below each model. Stripes running from upper left to lower right
in each microscopic image are daily deposited incremental lines, which allow the amount of time it took for
a tooth to grow to be reconstructed [Credit: D’Emic et al. 2019]
Although at least a few hundred meat-eating dinosaur species roamed the Earth, researchers have analyzed tooth-replacement rates for only about a half-dozen of them, D'Emic says. He also has looked into tooth-replacement patterns in plant-eating dinosaurs.

"I'm hoping this latest project spurs more people to study other species. I bet that will reveal further surprises," he says. "And hopefully that will lead to a better understanding of how dinosaurs evolved to be successful for so long."


Importantly, the recent study examined two additional species of predatory dinosaur (Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus), providing an opportunity to consider tooth-growth patterns at a broader scale.

In collaboration with Patrick O'Connor, professor of anatomy at Ohio University, and Ph.D. student Eric Lund, D'Emic used a collection of isolated fossil teeth to examine microscopic growth lines in the teeth. These growth lines are similar to tree rings, but instead of being deposited once a year, they were deposited daily. At the same, the team used computerized tomography (CT) on intact jaws to visualize unerupted teeth growing deep inside the bones. That allowed them to estimate tooth-replacement rates in a large number of individual jaws so they could cross-check their results.

People and climate led to Australia's megafauna extinction


The mystery of the role of people and climate in the fate of Australian megafauna might have been solved in a breakthrough study.

People and climate led to Australia's megafauna extinction
Pleistocene kangaroo was the largest and most heavily built kangaroo known
[Credit: Flinders University]
'Megafauna', giant beasts that once roamed the continent -- including wombat-like creatures as big as cars, birds more than two metres tall, and lizards more than seven metres long -- became extinct about 42,000 years ago. But the role of people in their demise has been hotly debated for decades.

For the first time, the research suggests a combination of climate change and the impact of people sealed the fate of megafauna, at least in south-eastern Australia. And that distribution of freshwater -- a precious commodity for animals and people alike as the climate warmed -- can explain regional differences in the timing at which megafauna died out.


The new study, led by a team of researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), analysed fossil data, climate reconstructions, and archaeological information describing patterns in human migration across south-eastern Australia.

The team developed and applied sophisticated mathematical models to test scenarios to explain regional variation in the periods during which people and megafauna coexisted.


"There has been much debate among scientists about what conditions led to this extinction event," said lead author Dr Frederik Saltre, Research Fellow and Coordinator of the Global Ecology Lab at Flinders University.

"Resolving this question is important because it is one of the oldest such extinction events anywhere after modern human beings evolved and left Africa", he added.


The findings, published in Nature Communications, are the result of analysis and complex modelling based on data including more than 10,000 fossils and archaeological records. Using high-quality fossil data and archaeological evidence of human activity, the researchers were able to map regional patterns of megafauna extinction.

They developed sophisticated models to test the impact of factors including climate, water availability, and human activity on localised patterns of megafauna extinction.

People and climate led to Australia's megafauna extinction
Credit: Flinders University
The extinction pattern could only be explained by the combination of people sharing the environment and the reduced of availability of freshwater due to climate change.

"The regional patterns in extinction are best explained by the hypothesis that people migrated across Australia, exploiting lakes and other sources of drinking water connecting the drier regions in between," said co-investigator Professor Corey Bradshaw of the Global Ecology Lab at Flinders University.

"It is plausible that megafauna species were attracted to the same freshwater sources as humans, thus increasing the chance of interactions."

The new insight that human pressure and climate change work together to trigger species extinction is a "stark warning" for the immediate future of the planet's biodiversity facing even stronger climate and habitat disruption, Dr Saltre concluded.

Source: Flinders University [November 27, 2019]

Animal-like embryos evolved before animals


Animals evolved from single-celled ancestors, before diversifying into 30 or 40 distinct anatomical designs. When and how animal ancestors made the transition from single-celled microbes to complex multicellular organisms has been the focus of intense debate.

Animal-like embryos evolved before animals
Three-dimensional reconstruction of a Caveasphaera specimen,
showing cell structures [Credit: NIGPAS]
Until now, this question could only be addressed by studying living animals and their relatives, but now the research team has found evidence that a key step in this major evolutionary transition occurred long before complex animals appear in the fossil record, in the fossilised embryos that resemble multicellular stages in the life cycle of single-celled relatives of animals.

The team discovered the fossils named Caveasphaera in 609 million-year old rocks in the Guizhou Province of South China. Individual Caveasphaera fossils are only about half a millimeter in diameter, but X-ray microscopy revealed that they were preserved all the way down to their component cells.


Kelly Vargas, from the University of Bristol's School of Earth Sciences, said: "X-Ray tomographic microscopy works like a medical CT scanner, but allows us to see features that are less than a thousandth of a millimeter in size. We were able to sort the fossils into growth stages, reconstructing the embryology of Caveasphaera."

Co-author Zongjun Yin, from Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology in China, added: "Our results show that Caveasphaera sorted its cells during embryo development, in just the same way as living animals, including humans, but we have no evidence that these embryos developed into more complex organisms."

Animal-like embryos evolved before animals
Computer models based on X-ray tomographic microscopy of the fossils, showing the successive stages
of development [Credit: Philip Donoghue & Zongjun Yin]
Co-author Dr John Cunningham, also from University of Bristol, said: "Caveasphaera had a life cycle like the close living relatives of animals, which alternate between single-celled and multicellular stages. However, Caveasphaera goes one step further, reorganising those cells during embryology."

Co-author Stefan Bengtson, from the Swedish Museum of Natural History, said "Caveasphaera is the earliest evidence of this most important step in the evolution of animals, which allowed them to develop distinct tissue layers and organs".


Co-author Maoyan Zhu, also from Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, said he is not totally convinced that Caveasphaera is an animal. He added: "Caveasphaera looks a lot like the embryos of some starfish and corals - we don't find the adult stages simply because they are harder to fossilise

Co-author Dr Federica Marone from the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland said "this study shows the amazing detail that can be preserved in the fossil record but also the power of X-ray microscopes in uncovering secrets preserved in stone without destroying the fossils."

a) and b), SEM image(s) of naked Caveasphaera specimen(s) with cellular structures;
e), f) showing detail of the cellular structures; c) and d), Caveasphaera specimens
with well-preserved envelope [Credit: NIGPAS]
Co-author Professor Philip Donoghue, also from the University of Bristol's School of Earth Sciences, said "Caveasphaera shows features that look both like microbial relatives of animals and early embryo stages of primitive animals. We're still searching for more fossils that may help us to decide.

"Either way, fossils of Caveasphaera tell us that animal-like embryonic development evolved long before the oldest definitive animals appear in the fossil record."

The findings are published in Current Biology.

Source: University of Bristol [November 27, 2019]

Researchers show how feathers propel birds through air and history


New research from an international team led by USC scientists set out to learn how feathers developed and helped birds spread across the world. Flight feathers, in particular, are masterpieces of propulsion and adaptation, helping penguins swim, eagles soar and hummingbirds hover.

Researchers show how feathers propel birds through air and history
A Taiwan blue magpie in flight [Credit: Shao Huan Lang]
Despite such diversity, the feather shares a common core design: a one-style-fits-all model with option trims for specialized performance. This simplicity and flexibility found in nature holds promise for engineers looking for better ways to build drones, wind turbines, medical implants and other advanced materials.

Those findings, published in Cell, offer an in-depth look at the form and function of a feather based on a comparative analysis of their physical structure, cellular composition and evolution. The study compares feathers of 21 bird species from around the world.

"We've always wondered how birds can fly in so many different ways, and we found the difference in flight styles is largely due to the characteristics of their flight feathers," said Cheng-Ming Chuong, the study's lead author and a developmental biologist in the Department of Pathology at the Keck School of Medicine of USC. "We want to learn how flight feathers are made so we can better understand nature and learn how biological architecture principles can benefit modern technology."


To gain a comprehensive understanding of the flight feather, Chuong formed a multi-disciplinary international team with Wen Tau Juan, a biophysicist at the Integrative Stem Cell Center, China Medical University in Taiwan. The work involved experts in stem cells, molecular biology, anatomy, physics, bio-imaging, engineering, materials science, bioinformatics and animal science. The bird species studied include ostrich, sparrow, eagle, chickens, ducks, swallow, owl, penguin, peacock, heron and hummingbird, among others.

They compared feathers using fossils, stem cells and flight performance characteristics. They focused on the feather shaft, or rachis, that supports the feather much like a mast holds a sail, bearing the stress between wind and wing. They also focused on the vane, the lateral branches astride the shaft that give the feather its shape to flap the air. And they examined how evolution shaped the barbs, ridges and hooks that help a feather hold its form and lock with adjacent feathers like Velcro to form a wing. The goal was to understand how a simple filament appendage on dinosaurs transformed into a three-level branched structure with different functions.

For birds such as ducks, eagles and sparrows that fly in different modes, the scientists noted significant differences in the feather shaft compared to ground-hugging birds. On the rigid exterior, the shaft cortex was thinner and lightweight, while the interior was filled with porous cells resembling bubble wrap, aligned into bands of various orientations and reinforced with ridges that operate like tiny lateral beams. Together, it forms a light, hollow and buoyant structure to enable flight. Cross-sections of feather shafts of different birds show highly specialized shapes and orientations of the inner core and outer cortex.

Researchers show how feathers propel birds through air and history
This picture shows a the asymmetric vane and tapering main shaft of a single flight feather
from a goshawk [Credit: Hao Howard Wu & Wen Tau Juan]
"The flight feather is made of two highly adaptable architectural modules, light and strong materials that can develop into highly adaptable configurations," Chuong said.

The researchers discovered two different molecular mechanisms guiding feather growth. Cortex thickness was governed by bone morphogenetic proteins, which are molecular signals for tissue growth. The porous feather interior, or medulla, relied upon a different mechanism known as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b). Both components originate as stem cells in the bird's skin.

By contrast, feathers in flightless birds were simpler, consisting of a dense cortex exterior that is more rigid and sturdy with fewer internal struts and cells found in flying birds. The features were especially pronounced for penguins, which use wings as paddles under the water.


As part of the study, the researchers looked at nearly 100 million-year-old feathers, found embedded in amber in Myanmar. These fossils show early feathers lacked one key feature that modern birds have. Specifically, the researchers report how fossil feathers had barb branches and barbules, which form a feather vane by overlapping, but not hooklets. The hooklets, which act like clasps to turn fluffy feathers into a tight flat plane for high-performance flight, evolved later. The scientists also identified WNT2B, another growth factor, as the agent that controls hooklet formation. These also originated from epidermal stem cells.

Taken together, the findings show how feathered dinosaurs and early birds could form a primitive vane by overlapping barbule plates, although that wasn't aerodynamically fit to carry much load. As more complex composite features occurred in the wing, it got heavier, so feather shafts became stronger yet more lightweight, which led to stiffer feathers and sturdy wings that powered flight to carry birds around the world.

"Our findings suggest the evolutionary trends of feather shaft and vane are balanced for the best flight performance of an individual bird and become part of the selective basis of speciation," the study says. "The principles of functional architectures we studied here may also stimulate bio-inspired designs and fabrication of future composite materials for architectures of different scales, including wind turbines, artificial tissues, flying drones."

Source: University of Southern California [November 27, 2019]

Solving fossil mystery could aid quest for ancient life on Mars


Research which suggests that structures previously thought to be fossils may, in fact, be mineral deposits could save future Mars missions valuable time and resources.

Solving fossil mystery could aid quest for ancient life on Mars
A life-like structure created in the lab by chemical gardening
[Credit: Sean McMahon]
Microscopic tubes and filaments that resemble the remains of tiny creatures may have been formed by chemical reactions involving iron-rich minerals, the study shows. Previous research had suggested that such structures were among the oldest fossils on Earth.

The new findings could aid the search for extraterrestrial life during future missions to Mars by making it easier to distinguish between fossils and non-biological structures.

The discovery was made by a scientist from the University of Edinburgh who is developing techniques to seek evidence that life once existed on Mars.


Astrobiologist Sean McMahon created tiny formations in the lab that closely mimic the shape and chemical composition of iron-rich structures commonly found in Mars-like rocks on Earth, where some examples are thought to be around four billion years old.

Dr McMahon created the complex structures by mixing iron-rich particles with alkaline liquids containing the chemicals silicate or carbonate.

This process - known as chemical gardening - is thought to occur naturally where these chemicals abound. It can occur in hydrothermal vents on the seabed and when deep groundwater circulates through pores and fractures in rocks.


His findings suggest that structure alone is not sufficient to confirm whether or not microscopic life-like formations are fossils. More research will be needed to say exactly how they were formed.

The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme.

Dr Sean McMahon said: "Chemical reactions like these have been studied for hundreds of years but they had not previously been shown to mimic these tiny iron-rich structures inside rocks. These results call for a re-examination of many ancient real-world examples to see if they are more likely to be fossils or non-biological mineral deposits."

Source: University of Edinburgh [November 27, 2019]

World's oldest comma shrimp was way ahead of the curve


Scientists have discovered the world's oldest "comma" shrimp, a tiny crustacean shaped like its punctuation namesake. The 90-million-year-old creature fills in a major evolutionary gap for a family of marine animals now found in abundance around the planet, according to researchers from Yale and the University of Alaska. The discovery appears in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

World's oldest comma shrimp was way ahead of the curve
Eobodotria muisca [Credit: Javier Luque]
The fossilized shrimp, named Eobodotria muisca, comes from Mesozoic rocks in tropical South America. Researchers found exceptionally well-preserved fossils representing more than 500 individuals between 6 and 8 millimeters long, with features that are rarely preserved in fossil crustaceans: mouthparts, the gut, tiny hairs, and small compound eyes.

"We are amazed by how similar Eobodotria muisca is to today's species," said Yale paleontologist Javier Luque, lead author of the study. "There are eight families or main groups of living comma shrimp, and none of them have a confirmed fossil occurrence. This means we had no idea when modern comma shrimp evolved, until now."


The only previous record of a modern-looking comma shrimp is a 160-million-year-old fossil from Europe, Luque said. Although that shrimp fit within the range of comma shrimp body forms, it couldn't be linked to any of the main modern families of comma shrimp.

Eobodotria muisca, on the other hand, belongs to the Bodotriidae family of living comma shrimp, Luque said, extending the fossil record of that family of shrimp by nearly 100 million years.

The new species lived during the mid-Cretaceous period, when a long, narrow inland sea covered a large part of what is today the Eastern and Central Andes of Colombia. Luque found the fossils together with fossils of the crab Callichimaera perplexa. Eobodotria muisca is named after the Muisca native Americans who lived in the Colombian Andes.

Live 3-D model of Eobodotria muisca [Credit: Yale University]

Luque said that the similarity between Eobodotria muisca and its modern relatives suggests that the rates of external anatomical changes over millions of years in this group was low compared to other crustacean groups found in the same location. He also noted that the new cache of fossils is the first of its kind in northern South America.


Sarah Gerken of the University of Alaska-Anchorage is co-author of the study.

Gerken and Luque said most of the Eobodotria muisca fossils they found were adult males. Large aggregations of males usually happen in the water column when they are searching for females by means of their large antennae for smelling and their flappy tail appendages for swimming—both features that females lack, the researchers explained.

One possible explanation for this unusual accumulation of adult males is that they could have died suddenly in the water column while swarming in search of females, and then sunk down to the soft bottom where they fossilized, Gerken and Luque said.

The researchers said the discovery not only helps paleontologists understand the origin of the comma shrimp's curved body, it also can be used to help understand the origins of related crustaceans on the evolutionary family tree.

Author: Jim Shelton | Source: Yale University [November 26, 2019]

Did human hunting activities alone drive great auks' extinction?


New insight on the extinction history of a flightless seabird that vanished from the shores of the North Atlantic during the 19th century has been published in eLife.

Did human hunting activities alone drive great auks' extinction?
A mounted great auk skin, The Brussels Auk (RBINS 5355), from the collections
at the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS)
[Credit: Thierry Hubin, RBINS]
The findings suggest that intense hunting by humans could have caused the rapid extinction of the great auk, showing how even species that exist in large and widespread populations can be vulnerable to exploitation.

Great auks were large, flightless diving birds thought to have existed in the millions. They were distributed around the North Atlantic, with breeding colonies along the east coast of North America and especially on the islands off Newfoundland. They could also be found on islands off the coasts of Iceland and Scotland, as well as throughout Scandinavia.


But these birds had a long history of being hunted by humans. They were poached for their meat and eggs during prehistoric times, and this activity was further intensified in 1500 AD by European seamen visiting the fishing grounds of Newfoundland. Their feathers later became highly sought after in the 1700s, contributing further to their demise.

"Despite the well-documented history of exploitation since the 16th century, it is unclear whether hunting alone could have been responsible for the species' extinction, or whether the birds were already in decline due to natural environmental changes," says lead author Jessica Thomas, who completed the work as part of her PhD studies at Bangor University, UK, and the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and is now a postdoctoral researcher at Swansea University, Wales, UK.

Did human hunting activities alone drive great auks' extinction?
Great auk humeri from Funk Island. These samples are part of the great auk collection
at the American Museum of Natural History [Credit: J. Thomas]
To investigate this further, Thomas and her collaborators carried out combined analyses of ancient genetic data, GPS-based ocean current data, and population viability - a process that looks at the probability of a population going extinct within a given number of years. They sequenced complete mitochondrial genomes of 41 individuals from across the species' geographic range and used their analyses to reconstruct the birds' population structure and dynamics throughout the Holocene period, the last 11,700 years of Earth's history.

"Taken together, our data don't suggest that great auks were at risk of extinction prior to intensive human hunting behaviour in the early 16th century," explains co-senior author Thomas Gilbert, Professor of Evolutionary Genomics at the University of Copenhagen. "But critically, this doesn't mean that we've provided solid evidence that humans alone were the cause of great auk extinction. What we have demonstrated is that human hunting pressure was likely to have caused extinction even if the birds weren't already under threat from environmental changes."


Gilbert adds that their conclusions are limited by a couple of factors. The mitochondrial genome represents only a single genetic marker and, due to limited sample preservation and availability, the study sample size of 41 is relatively small for population genetic analyses.

"Despite these limitations, the findings help reveal how industrial-scale commercial exploitation of natural resources have the potential to drive an abundant, wide-ranging and genetically diverse species to extinction within a short period of time," says collaborator Gary Carvalho, Professor in Zoology (Molecular Ecology) at Bangor University. This echoes the conclusions of a previous study* on the passenger pigeon, a bird that existed in significant numbers before going extinct in the early 20th century.

"Our work also emphasises the need to thoroughly monitor commercially harvested species, particularly in poorly researched environments such as our oceans," concludes co-senior author Michael Knapp, Senior Lecturer in Biological Anthropology and Rutherford Discovery Fellow at the University of Otago, New Zealand. "This will help lay the platform for sustainable ecosystems and ensure more effective conservation efforts."

Source: eLife [November 26, 2019]